Ahead of the People’s Regulatory Roundtable at Consensus 2025, six leading crypto lawyers explore the impact of regulation on core values like decentralization and privacy. They discuss safeguarding these principles while promoting innovation in the industry, with insights on compliance, transparency, and user empowerment. The panel aims to clarify the future of crypto amidst evolving legislation.
Fast Summary
As discussions heat up ahead of the People’s Regulatory Roundtable at Consensus 2025, experts weigh in on the challenges facing the crypto landscape amid evolving regulatory frameworks. Core values like privacy, decentralization, and individual sovereignty are up for debate, as industry veterans share their thoughts on safeguarding these principles while fostering innovation.
Article Body
With the looming regulatory wave, many in the cryptocurrency community are grappling with how current ideals may or may not survive. A roundtable at Consensus 2025 will dive into these matters, where six seasoned crypto lawyers share perspectives on important topics like ensuring values are upheld in legislation. \n
The panel features key figures including Kayvan Sadeghi and Connor Spelliscy, among others, eager to discuss financial decentralization and privacy. Scheduled for May 14 at 10 a.m., individuals are encouraged to submit questions ahead to [email protected]. \n
Kicking off the discourse, Kayvan Sadeghi stresses the vital nature of individual freedom and sovereignty. He believes that privacy and decentralisation serve as tools to maintain this sovereignty, particularly against the threats posed by surveillance. He argues that reframing the conversation around tech achieving legal goals more effectively is crucial. Essentially, technology can help eliminate the human-driven risks that lead to corruption and greed. \n
Connor Spelliscy echoes these thoughts, highlighting blockchain’s potential to ensure transparency and security, contingent on supportive regulatory frameworks. He urges that regulation should incentivise decentralization to enhance consumer control over their assets. Furthermore, he notes that various decentralised platforms could emerge as alternatives to existing giants, offering users richer opportunities to own and manage their data more securely. \n
Lewis Cohen shifts the focus to the community members rather than merely technological attributes. He points to the diverse range of motivations among those entering the crypto sphere, emphasising their drive for innovation and a new “Internet of Value.” His commitment to serving this community reflects a vision built on collective creativity rather than corporate monopolies.
Michelle Gitlitz underscores decentralisation as a critical value, pointing out how distributed power leads to genuine ownership and free transactions. She argues for thoughtful regulation tailored to blockchain systems that keeps users safe from financial harm while preventing crimes.
David Adlerstein, a corporate lawyer reinventing from traditional laws, aligns strongly with principles of free markets and the freedom to innovate. He believes regulatory safeguards shouldn’t hinder creativity but rather adapt to encourage new business models that align with liberal democratic values. He reminds us that regulation, when credible, can build a resilient market without halting innovation. \n
Kayvan also touches on the impact sensible regulations might have on community-driven business and engagement. Good regulations can indeed empower more individuals, lowering barriers for creative participation and capital distribution.
Connor believes we are still in a waiting game with mainstream interest in blockchain growing, but questions remain about the scalability of projects. He is hopeful though — areas like decentralised AI and digital identity could launch impactful advancements once clearer legislation emerges. \n
Lewis keeps a positive outlook as well, suggesting that regulation should grow organically with emerging business models, refreshed much like the initial roads built for automobiles. A beneficial regulatory landscape may indeed facilitate innovation and practical progress. \n
Michelle brings experience from compliance-heavy industries to the table, showcasing how thorough regulation can uplift crypto ventures by fostering trust among users. Compliance solutions that harness blockchain’s capabilities may assist these companies in navigating complex regulatory environments effectively.
Lastly, David expands on narratives within crypto, particularly the promise of stablecoins which blend commerce and technology. He highlights their increasing popularity and the imminent need for precise regulations to guard against financial risks and illicit use while promoting wider interoperability within the market.
Ultimately, as the regulatory landscape unfolds, how well crypto values endure the changes remains to be seen. The roundtable at Consensus 2025 aims to address these uncertainties and explore the path forward for the crypto community.
